Comments on: Compromise or No-compromise whose to say http://f1jam.com/2007/04/11/compromise-or-no-compromise-whose-to-say/ Jamming F1 Style... Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:13:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2 By: Haas http://f1jam.com/2007/04/11/compromise-or-no-compromise-whose-to-say/#comment-1194 Haas Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:22:08 +0000 http://f1jam.com/2007/04/11/compromise-or-no-compromise-whose-to-say/#comment-1194 I think its not fair to just compare the speed trap reading to tell if there was any toning down done on the car. Jean Todt admitted after the race that almost a tenth of a second was reduced from the engine's performance to last the weekend. That being said the gap between the top two teams at Sepang was far more than a tenth. All in all only Ferrari know what compromise was done and how much it actually effected the result. There is a possibility that this quote was used to get a small physiological advantage over the Silver Arrows... Remember both Mc Laren drivers quoted before the race that Ferrari was far ahead and proved in the race that the gap was now minute, maybe it was Mc Laren trying to make Ferrari feel overconfident... I think its not fair to just compare the speed trap reading to tell if there was any toning down done on the car. Jean Todt admitted after the race that almost a tenth of a second was reduced from the engine’s performance to last the weekend. That being said the gap between the top two teams at Sepang was far more than a tenth.

All in all only Ferrari know what compromise was done and how much it actually effected the result. There is a possibility that this quote was used to get a small physiological advantage over the Silver Arrows… Remember both Mc Laren drivers quoted before the race that Ferrari was far ahead and proved in the race that the gap was now minute, maybe it was Mc Laren trying to make Ferrari feel overconfident…

]]> By: MAK http://f1jam.com/2007/04/11/compromise-or-no-compromise-whose-to-say/#comment-1195 MAK Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:37:06 +0000 http://f1jam.com/2007/04/11/compromise-or-no-compromise-whose-to-say/#comment-1195 I have say that because what ever "compromises" they made had to be on the engine so i thought to use speed as a measure, offcourse speed along with RPM information would have given more idea about it, since later information i couldn't get hold off, so just used speed. anyways both Ferrari's where there in top 4 sector timings as well. one tenth second second loss that he admitted to is think, due to moving floor elimination rather than the "compromises". I have say that because what ever “compromises” they made had to be on the engine so i thought to use speed as a measure, offcourse speed along with RPM information would have given more idea about it, since later information i couldn’t get hold off, so just used speed.

anyways both Ferrari’s where there in top 4 sector timings as well.

one tenth second second loss that he admitted to is think, due to moving floor elimination rather than the “compromises”.

]]> By: Ankit http://f1jam.com/2007/04/11/compromise-or-no-compromise-whose-to-say/#comment-1198 Ankit Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:03:10 +0000 http://f1jam.com/2007/04/11/compromise-or-no-compromise-whose-to-say/#comment-1198 blogf1.blogspot.com has shifted to f1chronicles.com, please update the blogroll , and also please change the name from formula one season 2006 to rediscover formula one. Thanks blogf1.blogspot.com

has shifted to f1chronicles.com, please update the blogroll , and also please change the name from formula one season 2006 to rediscover formula one.

Thanks

]]>